GalacticCactus Forum

Author Topic: Dear Expert  (Read 165402 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline rivka

  • Linguistic Anarchist
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 14,155
    • View Profile
Re: Dear Expert
« Reply #725 on: September 24, 2013, 11:42:59 AM »
In Hebrew and Yiddish, in and on are not distinct/separate as they are in English.
"Sometimes you need a weirdo to tell you that things have gotten weird. Your normal friends, neighbors, and coworkers won’t tell you."
-Aaron Kunin

Offline Dobie

  • Veteran Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 161
    • View Profile
Re: Dear Expert
« Reply #726 on: September 24, 2013, 03:32:16 PM »
Chinese uses no prepositions for dates and times.

Japanese uses the particle "ni" for specific points in time. (It's the same particle that means, "in," "at," and "to" in other contexts). You use it in phrases like "I'm leaving AT 8:00" or "I was born ON June 1st" or "He died IN 1980." But you wouldn't use any particle to say things like "tomorrow," "today," "this year," etc.

So there's your input from some non Indo-European languages.

So if a samurai tells you the time does that make him one of them?

Offline Annie Subjunctive

  • Hausfrau
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,921
    • View Profile
Re: Dear Expert
« Reply #727 on: September 24, 2013, 03:58:07 PM »
Chinese uses no prepositions for dates and times.

Japanese uses the particle "ni" for specific points in time. (It's the same particle that means, "in," "at," and "to" in other contexts). You use it in phrases like "I'm leaving AT 8:00" or "I was born ON June 1st" or "He died IN 1980." But you wouldn't use any particle to say things like "tomorrow," "today," "this year," etc.

So there's your input from some non Indo-European languages.

So if a samurai tells you the time does that make him one of them?

How did I know that joke was coming?

Yes, yes it does. It also includes all Chinese people ever, for whom ni is the second-person pronoun.
"It is true, however, that the opposite of Little Rock, Arkansas is Boulder, Colorado." - Tante

Offline Dobie

  • Veteran Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 161
    • View Profile
Re: Dear Expert
« Reply #728 on: September 24, 2013, 04:01:19 PM »
I never knew all Chinese people had knighthoods.

Offline Annie Subjunctive

  • Hausfrau
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,921
    • View Profile
Re: Dear Expert
« Reply #729 on: September 24, 2013, 07:14:24 PM »
"It is true, however, that the opposite of Little Rock, Arkansas is Boulder, Colorado." - Tante

Offline Dobie

  • Veteran Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 161
    • View Profile
Re: Dear Expert
« Reply #730 on: September 26, 2013, 01:11:25 PM »

Offline Annie Subjunctive

  • Hausfrau
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,921
    • View Profile
Re: Dear Expert
« Reply #731 on: October 11, 2013, 03:39:50 PM »
You know how right can mean both the relative direction and also something that you're entitled to? I had the mind-blowing realization while trying to get to sleep that this same pair exists in both French and Spanish, though it doesn't seem that the words are related at all to the English right. (They're droit/droit and derecho/derecho). Why would the words mean both distinct things in all three languages if the words don't seem to be related? (Well, the French and Spanish seem like they could easily be related but the English seems really different)

Also weird is that both droit and derecho can also mean "straight, unturning," though in Spanish you distinguish when giving directions by saying al derecho for "straight" and a la derecha for "on the right."

How did this whole mess of words come about? (I could etymonline it but I thought Jonathon might have some more thorough info from the OED so I'm not going to spoil the surprise for myself)
"It is true, however, that the opposite of Little Rock, Arkansas is Boulder, Colorado." - Tante

Offline Annie Subjunctive

  • Hausfrau
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,921
    • View Profile
Re: Dear Expert
« Reply #732 on: October 11, 2013, 03:41:07 PM »
And then there's the separate meaning of "morally correct." Is that related too?
"It is true, however, that the opposite of Little Rock, Arkansas is Boulder, Colorado." - Tante

Offline Jonathon

  • Evil T-Rex
  • Administrator
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 24,680
  • This is the darkest timeline
    • View Profile
    • GalacticCactus
Re: Dear Expert
« Reply #733 on: October 11, 2013, 04:16:01 PM »
You know how right can mean both the relative direction and also something that you're entitled to? I had the mind-blowing realization while trying to get to sleep that this same pair exists in both French and Spanish, though it doesn't seem that the words are related at all to the English right. (They're droit/droit and derecho/derecho).

Spoiler alert: They are in fact related. The French and Spanish words come from the Latin directus, which is a participial form of dirigo, from dis + rego. Rego comes from the PIE *h₃reǵ-. This was suffixed and became **rehtaz in Proto-Germanic, and from thence became right in Modern English.

BAM.

Quote
Why would the words mean both distinct things in all three languages if the words don't seem to be related? (Well, the French and Spanish seem like they could easily be related but the English seems really different)

Also weird is that both droit and derecho can also mean "straight, unturning," though in Spanish you distinguish when giving directions by saying al derecho for "straight" and a la derecha for "on the right."

How did this whole mess of words come about? (I could etymonline it but I thought Jonathon might have some more thorough info from the OED so I'm not going to spoil the surprise for myself)

Supposing that they weren't related but shared the same patterns of meaning, I'd chalk it up to cultural diffusion, probably from the Romans to surrounding cultures. There could also be some universal (or at least widespread) natural metaphors driving the development of some meanings.
You underestimate my ability to take things seriously!

Offline Jonathon

  • Evil T-Rex
  • Administrator
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 24,680
  • This is the darkest timeline
    • View Profile
    • GalacticCactus
Re: Dear Expert
« Reply #734 on: October 11, 2013, 04:19:11 PM »
And then there's the separate meaning of "morally correct." Is that related too?

Yes. As far as I can tell, they're all related, though I'll have to elaborate later when I get home.
You underestimate my ability to take things seriously!

Offline Annie Subjunctive

  • Hausfrau
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,921
    • View Profile
Re: Dear Expert
« Reply #735 on: October 11, 2013, 04:21:59 PM »
Crazy!
"It is true, however, that the opposite of Little Rock, Arkansas is Boulder, Colorado." - Tante

Offline rivka

  • Linguistic Anarchist
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 14,155
    • View Profile
Re: Dear Expert
« Reply #736 on: October 11, 2013, 04:30:59 PM »
Possibly related to the notion that right = good and left = evil?
"Sometimes you need a weirdo to tell you that things have gotten weird. Your normal friends, neighbors, and coworkers won’t tell you."
-Aaron Kunin

Offline BlackBlade

  • Deadbeat Dad
  • Super Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,029
  • Gifs are all lies.
    • View Profile
Re: Dear Expert
« Reply #737 on: October 11, 2013, 10:15:34 PM »
Kyrgyzstan, is the homeland of the Kyrgyzs, a people best known for cheating at Scrabble. -Tante Shvester

What, you expected us to be badly injured or dead, and flying blind to boot? You're the one who told us all to be Awesome. -Brinestone

Offline Jonathon

  • Evil T-Rex
  • Administrator
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 24,680
  • This is the darkest timeline
    • View Profile
    • GalacticCactus
Re: Dear Expert
« Reply #738 on: October 12, 2013, 08:41:04 AM »
Wiktionary says that the meaning of *h₃reǵ- was 'to straighten, to right oneself', 'right', and 'just'. I'm guessing that 'straight' was the original meaning and that the others are metaphorical extensions. Straight = good and therefore correct or just. The right hand came to be called so because of the sense that it was the correct hand to use. The Online Etymology Dictionary says that right was not used this way in Old English; the word for the right hand was swiþra, meaning 'stronger'.
You underestimate my ability to take things seriously!

Offline rivka

  • Linguistic Anarchist
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 14,155
    • View Profile
Re: Dear Expert
« Reply #739 on: January 03, 2014, 01:04:48 PM »
This is a "how come?" question.

My original sentence started:
Quote
Once we have all the missing forms, we will be able to

Then I decided it needed to be prefaced with "only", and that meant I had to rearrange the order of "we will", resulting in
Quote
Only once we have all the missing forms, will we be able to

I'm fairly certain that's correct, but my question is why? What does adding the "only" do to the sentence structure?
"Sometimes you need a weirdo to tell you that things have gotten weird. Your normal friends, neighbors, and coworkers won’t tell you."
-Aaron Kunin

Offline Jonathon

  • Evil T-Rex
  • Administrator
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 24,680
  • This is the darkest timeline
    • View Profile
    • GalacticCactus
Re: Dear Expert
« Reply #740 on: January 03, 2014, 02:11:57 PM »
You have discovered subject-auxiliary inversion, specifically negative inversion. SAI occurs most frequently in questions, but it also occurs after negative phrases and clauses, with some uses of the subjunctive ("Had I known . . .") and in some clauses with than, as, or so ("so did Bob"). In this case, the only clause is negative because it essentially means "in no case except this one".

Explaining that such phrases cause inversion is easier than explaining why. It's apparently an ongoing problem in theories of syntax. But the constructions is apparently a holdover from earlier English syntax (known by linguists as V2, because the verb is always the second constituent in the sentence) that is still alive and well in other Germanic languages. In V2 languages, the nominal word order is subject-verb-object, but you can bump the subject from its slot but putting another constituent in its place, whether an adverb, object, or some other kind of complement. The verb stays put, and the subject moves after it. You can still see it sometimes in Early Modern English, but today it only appears (outside of questions) in a limited range of constructions, and it now requires creating an auxiliary verb if there isn't one ("I never kicked puppies" > "Never did I kick puppies").

P.S.: I'd also take out the comma after the fronted negative clause, but I'm having a hard time explaining why it would need it in your original but not in the revised sentence.
You underestimate my ability to take things seriously!

Offline BlackBlade

  • Deadbeat Dad
  • Super Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,029
  • Gifs are all lies.
    • View Profile
Re: Dear Expert
« Reply #741 on: January 03, 2014, 02:25:45 PM »
Quote
Only once we have all the missing forms, will we be able to,

That's the perfect construction in Mandarin. Not that you probably care. :)
Kyrgyzstan, is the homeland of the Kyrgyzs, a people best known for cheating at Scrabble. -Tante Shvester

What, you expected us to be badly injured or dead, and flying blind to boot? You're the one who told us all to be Awesome. -Brinestone

Offline rivka

  • Linguistic Anarchist
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 14,155
    • View Profile
Re: Dear Expert
« Reply #742 on: January 03, 2014, 04:02:33 PM »
P.S.: I'd also take out the comma after the fronted negative clause, but I'm having a hard time explaining why it would need it in your original but not in the revised sentence.
On reflection, I agree. With both parts. ;)

And thanks! Very interesting.
"Sometimes you need a weirdo to tell you that things have gotten weird. Your normal friends, neighbors, and coworkers won’t tell you."
-Aaron Kunin

Offline Jonathon

  • Evil T-Rex
  • Administrator
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 24,680
  • This is the darkest timeline
    • View Profile
    • GalacticCactus
Re: Dear Expert
« Reply #743 on: January 03, 2014, 04:11:27 PM »
You're very welcome!
You underestimate my ability to take things seriously!

Offline BlackBlade

  • Deadbeat Dad
  • Super Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,029
  • Gifs are all lies.
    • View Profile
Re: Dear Expert
« Reply #744 on: January 16, 2014, 05:36:47 PM »
So "ain't" is a contraction of "am not" but how? Other contractions like "don't" "isn't" and "can't" all make sense. But how do you get 'am' from 'ai'? Same question for won't how did we get 'wo' from 'will'?
Kyrgyzstan, is the homeland of the Kyrgyzs, a people best known for cheating at Scrabble. -Tante Shvester

What, you expected us to be badly injured or dead, and flying blind to boot? You're the one who told us all to be Awesome. -Brinestone

Offline Annie Subjunctive

  • Hausfrau
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,921
    • View Profile
Re: Dear Expert
« Reply #745 on: January 17, 2014, 12:07:16 PM »
I think in that case it's phonetic, based on the way people sad it rather than the way they wrote it.
"It is true, however, that the opposite of Little Rock, Arkansas is Boulder, Colorado." - Tante

Offline rivka

  • Linguistic Anarchist
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 14,155
    • View Profile
Re: Dear Expert
« Reply #746 on: January 17, 2014, 12:17:06 PM »
Merriam-Webster.com says it's originally a contraction of "are not", which leads more naturally into "ain't".

It also points out that it is used in place of all of the following: am not, are not, is not, have not, has not, do not, does not, did not.
"Sometimes you need a weirdo to tell you that things have gotten weird. Your normal friends, neighbors, and coworkers won’t tell you."
-Aaron Kunin

Offline Tante Shvester

  • Souper Member
  • Super Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 9,868
    • View Profile
    • About Tante
Re: Dear Expert
« Reply #747 on: January 19, 2014, 12:39:31 AM »
Dear Expert,

When did Dad and Daddy surpass Pop and Papa?  The latter seem more old fashioned to me.  Was it after WWII?  Is it a baby boomer thing?  Why would it change?
Fighting thread drift with guilt, reverse psychology, and chicken soup.
Sweet! Law of Moses loopholes! -- Anneke
I love Bones.  -- Sweet Clementine
She grew on him like she was a colony of E. coli and he was room-temperature Canadian beef. -- anonymous

Offline pooka

  • hover bear
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,877
    • View Profile
Re: Dear Expert
« Reply #748 on: January 19, 2014, 09:37:23 PM »
I don't quite understand why "are not" becomes "ain't" but I know that if you pronounce it /arent/ you're still saying two syllables but if you say /arnt/ it is a pretty heavy syllable.  The last three consonants are all coronal, a liquid, a nasal and a voiceless stop.  My guess is that the liquid became a glide either because it was "easier" for a disparate sound to be placed than a more similar one due to sonority gradient, or it is assimilating to the vowel.  Though I have to admit I never memorized vowel features, since most of my phonology was in Arabic. 
"From each according to his ability, to each according to his work."  Comte de Saint-Simon

Offline pooka

  • hover bear
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,877
    • View Profile
Re: Dear Expert
« Reply #749 on: January 19, 2014, 09:52:56 PM »
:cautiously:
Are all uses (with different person/number) of ain't equally acceptable as negative helping verbs in... let's say in spoken American English like would appear in a TV show where the character is not supposed to be anything unusual (like an android)?  Is it less standard paired with plurals?  In Black Vernacular English it can apparently be used as a general purpose negative marker.  

Having looked around a bit I'm not finding a hit for the phonemic extraction of ain't.  
"From each according to his ability, to each according to his work."  Comte de Saint-Simon