GalacticCactus Forum
« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Battlestar Grammatica  (Read 2874 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Jonathon

  • Evil T-Rex
  • Administrator
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 24,680
  • This is the darkest timeline
    • View Profile
    • GalacticCactus
Battlestar Grammatica
« on: December 04, 2006, 11:30:16 AM »
The other day we were watching some Battlestar Galactica (the episode "Home, pt. 2," I believe), and there was one scene that made me kind of groan. Some people are on a planet looking for something, and a guy asks a Cylon woman, "How much further?" She responds by saying it should be "farther" and explaining that "farther" is for physical distances while "further" is for more abstract things. Then he says something about how he's obviously not as smart as a Cylon. Ugh. Apparently even the oh-so-superior Cylons are still susceptible to linguistic fallacies.
Logged
You underestimate my ability to take things seriously!

Offline Porter

  • ruining funny with facts
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 22,333
  • long time lurker, first time poster
    • View Profile
Battlestar Grammatica
« Reply #1 on: December 04, 2006, 11:33:31 AM »
:cool:

Is what she said just plain false, or is it one of those "rules" that are more prescriptive than descriptive?
Logged
Tomorrow Poster
Sooner or later, this forum is going to max out on hyperliteralness.

Offline pooka

  • hover bear
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,877
    • View Profile
Battlestar Grammatica
« Reply #2 on: December 04, 2006, 12:04:42 PM »
There are cylon women, now?
Logged
"From each according to his ability, to each according to his work."  Comte de Saint-Simon

Offline Jonathon

  • Evil T-Rex
  • Administrator
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 24,680
  • This is the darkest timeline
    • View Profile
    • GalacticCactus
Battlestar Grammatica
« Reply #3 on: December 04, 2006, 12:20:13 PM »
Quote
:cool:

Is what she said just plain false, or is it one of those "rules" that are more prescriptive than descriptive?
Well, it's not entirely false, but I also wouldn't say that it's simply more prescriptive than descriptive. As with most prescriptive rules, there's some kernel of truth in it, but it's a gross oversimplification that tries to force the pair of words into a complementary distribution that has never existed (or even come very close to existing) in the language.
Logged
You underestimate my ability to take things seriously!

Offline Brinestone

  • Nerdkins
  • Super Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,235
    • View Profile
Battlestar Grammatica
« Reply #4 on: December 04, 2006, 12:29:29 PM »
Pooka: Yes, and they look like Victoria's Secret models.
Logged
Ephemerality is not binary. -Porter

Offline pooka

  • hover bear
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,877
    • View Profile
Battlestar Grammatica
« Reply #5 on: December 04, 2006, 12:32:26 PM »
I was going to ask if they are hot. :lol:  No wonder everyone likes the new series better.
« Last Edit: December 04, 2006, 12:32:44 PM by pooka »
Logged
"From each according to his ability, to each according to his work."  Comte de Saint-Simon

Offline Porter

  • ruining funny with facts
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 22,333
  • long time lurker, first time poster
    • View Profile
Battlestar Grammatica
« Reply #6 on: December 04, 2006, 12:36:22 PM »
Brinestone beat me too it.  I was going to say "Yes, and they're all hot."

One of them looks a lot like Xena.
Logged
Tomorrow Poster
Sooner or later, this forum is going to max out on hyperliteralness.

Offline Porter

  • ruining funny with facts
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 22,333
  • long time lurker, first time poster
    • View Profile
Battlestar Grammatica
« Reply #7 on: December 04, 2006, 01:14:58 PM »
Quote
Well, it's not entirely false, but I also wouldn't say that it's simply more prescriptive than descriptive. As with most prescriptive rules, there's some kernel of truth in it, but it's a gross oversimplification that tries to force the pair of words into a complementary distribution that has never existed (or even come very close to existing) in the language.
If I won't understand the answer, I shouldn't ask the question. >.<
« Last Edit: December 04, 2006, 02:06:34 PM by Porteiro »
Logged
Tomorrow Poster
Sooner or later, this forum is going to max out on hyperliteralness.

Offline Noemon

  • Arbiter of Cool
  • Super Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,059
    • View Profile
Battlestar Grammatica
« Reply #8 on: December 04, 2006, 01:49:52 PM »
Admit it, Jonathan--you thought of the subject line for this thread ages ago, and have been itching to use it ever since.
Logged
I wish more people were able to be like me. 
-Porter

I'm about perfect.
-pooka

I hope you have a wonderful adventure in Taiwan. Not a swashbuckling adventure, just a prawn flavored pringles adventure.

-pooka

Offline Porter

  • ruining funny with facts
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 22,333
  • long time lurker, first time poster
    • View Profile
Battlestar Grammatica
« Reply #9 on: December 04, 2006, 02:05:43 PM »
:D
Logged
Tomorrow Poster
Sooner or later, this forum is going to max out on hyperliteralness.

Offline Jonathon

  • Evil T-Rex
  • Administrator
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 24,680
  • This is the darkest timeline
    • View Profile
    • GalacticCactus
Battlestar Grammatica
« Reply #10 on: December 04, 2006, 05:19:09 PM »
Porteiro: What part of that didn't you understand?

Noemon: I'm ashamed to admit that it only occurred to me last night. :blush:  
Logged
You underestimate my ability to take things seriously!

Offline Porter

  • ruining funny with facts
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 22,333
  • long time lurker, first time poster
    • View Profile
Battlestar Grammatica
« Reply #11 on: December 04, 2006, 05:31:16 PM »
Your point.
Logged
Tomorrow Poster
Sooner or later, this forum is going to max out on hyperliteralness.

Offline Jonathon

  • Evil T-Rex
  • Administrator
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 24,680
  • This is the darkest timeline
    • View Profile
    • GalacticCactus
Battlestar Grammatica
« Reply #12 on: December 04, 2006, 05:42:44 PM »
My original point was that if the Cylons really had a superior grasp of grammar and usage, then they would know that further and farther naturally have a lot of overlap. The idea that one word should be used in one situation and the other word in all other situations is artificial.

Just like the Cylons. :fear:  
Logged
You underestimate my ability to take things seriously!

Offline Porter

  • ruining funny with facts
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 22,333
  • long time lurker, first time poster
    • View Profile
Battlestar Grammatica
« Reply #13 on: December 04, 2006, 05:44:12 PM »
:)
Logged
Tomorrow Poster
Sooner or later, this forum is going to max out on hyperliteralness.

Offline Noemon

  • Arbiter of Cool
  • Super Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,059
    • View Profile
Battlestar Grammatica
« Reply #14 on: December 04, 2006, 05:53:52 PM »
Quote


Noemon: I'm ashamed to admit that it only occurred to me last night. :blush:
Well, it's easily the most clever thing I read all day, regardless of when you came up with it.  I've been kind of smiling about it ever since I read it.
« Last Edit: December 04, 2006, 05:54:18 PM by Noemon »
Logged
I wish more people were able to be like me. 
-Porter

I'm about perfect.
-pooka

I hope you have a wonderful adventure in Taiwan. Not a swashbuckling adventure, just a prawn flavored pringles adventure.

-pooka

Offline pooka

  • hover bear
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,877
    • View Profile
Battlestar Grammatica
« Reply #15 on: December 05, 2006, 06:06:34 AM »
But wouldn't it be Grammactica?
Logged
"From each according to his ability, to each according to his work."  Comte de Saint-Simon

Offline rav

  • Veteran Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 631
    • View Profile
Battlestar Grammatica
« Reply #16 on: December 07, 2006, 08:12:18 PM »
Battlestar Gra'ma
Logged

Offline Jonathon

  • Evil T-Rex
  • Administrator
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 24,680
  • This is the darkest timeline
    • View Profile
    • GalacticCactus
Battlestar Grammatica
« Reply #17 on: December 10, 2006, 08:07:25 PM »
Tada!



Unfortunately, I'm pretty sure I can't use it on t-shirts at my store. :(
« Last Edit: December 10, 2006, 08:18:09 PM by Jon Boy »
Logged
You underestimate my ability to take things seriously!

Offline Icarus

  • Scrabblemonger
  • Super Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,772
    • View Profile
Battlestar Grammatica
« Reply #18 on: December 11, 2006, 06:58:41 AM »
Too bad . . . I'd probably buy one.

-o-

I don't think I'd ever heard that "rule." When are you supposed to use "farther" and "further"?
Logged

Offline Icarus

  • Scrabblemonger
  • Super Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,772
    • View Profile
Battlestar Grammatica
« Reply #19 on: December 11, 2006, 07:00:26 AM »
I think I pretty much use "further" all the time except when I'm trying to make a fart joke. Is that the correct usage?
Logged

Offline pooka

  • hover bear
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,877
    • View Profile
Battlestar Grammatica
« Reply #20 on: December 11, 2006, 08:48:17 AM »
Oddly, there was a thread on this very subject not so long ago right here.
Logged
"From each according to his ability, to each according to his work."  Comte de Saint-Simon

Offline Jonathon

  • Evil T-Rex
  • Administrator
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 24,680
  • This is the darkest timeline
    • View Profile
    • GalacticCactus
Battlestar Grammatica
« Reply #21 on: December 11, 2006, 08:49:55 AM »
Quote
I think I pretty much use "further" all the time except when I'm trying to make a fart joke. Is that the correct usage?
That usage is sort of antiquated, but it's still used by respectable writers. You'd be fine sticking with it.
Logged
You underestimate my ability to take things seriously!
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »