Author Topic: Quotes from work (Read 180674 times)

The Genuine · « **Reply #1150 on:** September 11, 2012, 06:07:17 PM »

Quote from: Jonathon on September 10, 2012, 12:23:45 PM

"Every female who has not been placed, can, by proper arrangements, demand to be married."

That's a "be careful what you ask for" situation if I ever saw one. (Particularly if you live in the shadow of a psychiatric hospital.)

Tante Shvester · « **Reply #1151 on:** September 12, 2012, 07:59:15 AM »

Quote from: BlackBlade on September 11, 2012, 05:13:51 PM

My great great grandfather was commanded my Brigham Young to marry a widowed mother and her daughter.

I know right?!

My mind gets all boggley.

Jonathon · « **Reply #1152 on:** September 12, 2012, 09:44:55 AM »

Quote from: BlackBlade on September 11, 2012, 05:13:51 PM

My great great grandfather was commanded my Brigham Young to marry a widowed mother and her daughter.

I know right?!

BlackBlade · « **Reply #1153 on:** September 12, 2012, 10:11:09 AM »

Joking aside I think that would be a very interesting family dynamic to watch as a fly on the wall.

pooka · « **Reply #1154 on:** September 12, 2012, 05:41:48 PM »

Well, the doctrine of polygamy was for welfare as much as for multiplying.

Jonathon · « **Reply #1155 on:** September 24, 2012, 09:51:58 AM »

Quote

The certainty is that your body will, in due time, grow old and eventually become uninhabitable.

BlackBlade · « **Reply #1156 on:** September 24, 2012, 01:58:50 PM »

Oh yeah? Tell that to the bacteria and worms waiting for you to die.

Jonathon · « **Reply #1157 on:** September 24, 2012, 02:05:12 PM »

Uninhabitable for our spirits, at any rate (which was clear from context). I just thought it was an amusing way to put it.

BlackBlade · « **Reply #1158 on:** September 24, 2012, 02:42:54 PM »

Quote from: Jonathon on September 24, 2012, 02:05:12 PM

Uninhabitable for our spirits, at any rate (which was clear from context). I just thought it was an amusing way to put it.

Even in regards to our spirits it's not true. Did Elijah's body become uninhabitable?

Jonathon · « **Reply #1159 on:** September 24, 2012, 02:48:21 PM »

Maybe you should take it up with President Packer, who wrote the article.

BlackBlade · « **Reply #1160 on:** September 24, 2012, 03:44:38 PM »

Quote from: Jonathon on September 24, 2012, 02:48:21 PM

Maybe you should take it up with President Packer, who wrote the article.

I have issues with President Packer I would resolve first before that one.

Jonathon · « **Reply #1161 on:** September 24, 2012, 04:27:23 PM »

Well, I'll let you two work it out.

BlackBlade · « **Reply #1162 on:** September 24, 2012, 04:29:17 PM »

Quote from: Jonathon on September 24, 2012, 04:27:23 PM

Well, I'll let you two work it out.

Until one of us is uninhabitable then!

Porter · « **Reply #1163 on:** September 25, 2012, 07:24:30 AM »

Quote from: Jonathon on September 24, 2012, 02:05:12 PM

Uninhabitable for our spirits, at any rate (which was clear from context). I just thought it was an amusing way to put it.

I like it.

I'm also a big fan of Packer.

BlackBlade · « **Reply #1164 on:** September 25, 2012, 08:11:55 AM »

I like President Packer just fine, but some of his decisions regarding church administration bother me. I'm sure that could be said of just about anybody though.

Tante Shvester · « **Reply #1165 on:** September 25, 2012, 09:21:54 AM »

Quote from: Porter on September 25, 2012, 07:24:30 AM

Quote from: Jonathon on September 24, 2012, 02:05:12 PM
Uninhabitable for our spirits, at any rate (which was clear from context). I just thought it was an amusing way to put it.
I like it.

Me too.

Zalmoxis · « **Reply #1166 on:** October 05, 2012, 01:28:32 PM »

A faculty member took the executive to task for using the word "meeting invite" in an email. He said that you invite someone to a meeting or extend a meeting invitation, but not a meeting invite. So I hopped on to OED (thanks to my awesome local library) and took a screen shot for her that shows that invite has been used as a noun since 1615.

pooka · « **Reply #1167 on:** October 15, 2012, 11:58:32 AM »

Quote

As used herein, the singular form of a noun or pronoun will include within its meaning the plural form of a noun or pronoun, and vice versa; the use of the masculine form of a pronoun will include within its meaning the feminine form of the pronoun, and vice versa; the use of the tense of any verb will include all other tenses of the verb so used; and the use of “and” will include “or” and vice versa.

She works hard for the money, so hard for it honey... (I am singing this about my job typing, and not to say "we did work hard for the money" and vice versa.)

Jonathon · « **Reply #1168 on:** October 15, 2012, 12:46:30 PM »

What the heck is that from, pooka?

pooka · « **Reply #1169 on:** October 15, 2012, 03:24:51 PM »

Plaintiff interrogatories definitions and instructions. I'm afraid it might be standard for this sort of thing.

The Genuine · « **Reply #1170 on:** October 16, 2012, 06:31:52 AM »

I've never seen anything quite like that before. In fact, I think it disadvantageously adds a lot of ambiguity.

The point of interrogatories and requests for admission is to back people into corners. The only time you want to be really broad is with requests for production (usually documents).

pooka · « **Reply #1171 on:** October 16, 2012, 12:45:53 PM »

It's a mistaken identity case involving the AP and the NYT (a classroom treatment of an actual case from 1998). So a lot of it involves documents, photos, records, communications which include... (someone kill me before I continue)

spacepook · « **Reply #1172 on:** October 16, 2012, 05:04:59 PM »

:zaps with taser:
:CPR:

rivka · « **Reply #1173 on:** November 06, 2012, 11:08:33 AM »

Quote

“While this might be quote on quote easy to get, we make sure the families understand what they’re getting into,” Nutt said.

*wince*

Tante Shvester · « **Reply #1174 on:** November 07, 2012, 09:25:39 AM »