GalacticCactus Forum

Poll

Which phrase is synonymous with "all of them weren't . . ."?

some of them weren't
2 (10.5%)
none of them were
14 (73.7%)
other (please explain)
3 (15.8%)

Total Members Voted: 19

Author Topic: A linguistic survey  (Read 6352 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Jonathon

  • Evil T-Rex
  • Administrator
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 24,673
  • This is the darkest timeline
    • View Profile
    • GalacticCactus
A linguistic survey
« on: November 22, 2004, 11:55:41 AM »
Please say where you're from, and if you feel the need to explain your answer, go ahead and do so.
You underestimate my ability to take things seriously!

Offline eslaine

  • Veteran Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 539
    • View Profile
    • scatterfilter
A linguistic survey
« Reply #1 on: November 22, 2004, 11:59:10 AM »
Feeling misunderstood?

(oops, NoCal)
« Last Edit: November 22, 2004, 12:16:46 PM by eslaine »
If you quote me, then God loves you.
--Nathan

Offline Jonathon

  • Evil T-Rex
  • Administrator
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 24,673
  • This is the darkest timeline
    • View Profile
    • GalacticCactus
A linguistic survey
« Reply #2 on: November 22, 2004, 12:08:38 PM »
No, just curious. I wonder if it's a regional difference, or if it's something more random. I had always thought one was American and one was Canadian (because I heard it on some Canadian PBS shows growing up), but I just read something in which an American used the Canadian one. Now I'm wondering what the distribution is.
You underestimate my ability to take things seriously!

Offline TheTick

  • Veteran Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 448
    • View Profile
    • Honk if you Love Justice!
A linguistic survey
« Reply #3 on: November 22, 2004, 12:12:08 PM »
Picked the second choice, grew up in Virginia.
"I'm a lot more ecologically oriented than most republicans I know." - pooka
"I don't know what I'm do, or how I do, I just do."

Offline saxon75

  • Super Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,081
    • View Profile
    • http://www.sakeriver.com
A linguistic survey
« Reply #4 on: November 22, 2004, 12:12:54 PM »
I went with "none of them were," but I think there is definitely room for misunderstanding.  I think I'd have to hear it in context and out loud.  It's a poor way to phrase it either way.  Really, it should be "not all of them were . . ." or "none of them were . . ."

I had a similar problem back in college with an ad that got posted on some of the tables in the dining hall.  It was an anti-alcohol abuse campaign, and the slogan was "Everyone doesn't drink."  It seems clear that they meant "Not everyone drinks," but it could also be interpreted as "No one drinks."  I grimaced every time I saw that stupid ad.

<--- From California, central coast region
Bah weep granah weep ninni bong.

Offline sarcasticmuppet

  • Muppet Treasure Island
  • Super Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,196
    • View Profile
A linguistic survey
« Reply #5 on: November 22, 2004, 12:42:27 PM »
Second choice, raised in Arkansas by Californian speakers.
You know, I think I'd make a great Queen of England.  --Porter

Offline FLR

  • Veteran Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 224
    • View Profile
A linguistic survey
« Reply #6 on: November 22, 2004, 02:14:39 PM »
all of them weren't

none of them were


I think the first meaning would be more clear with "Not ALL of them were".  I guess with the right inflection it could make sense.  But parsing it logically, the second choice seemed obvious.  I grew up in Virginia and moved to Utah at 17.

"All of them weren't broken."

"All of them weren't green."

"All of them weren't hungry."

You know, I'm now having trouble thinking of it meaning what I voted for.

"All of them weren't going to St. Ives."
Firenze La Regiphage

Offline Jonathon

  • Evil T-Rex
  • Administrator
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 24,673
  • This is the darkest timeline
    • View Profile
    • GalacticCactus
A linguistic survey
« Reply #7 on: November 22, 2004, 02:37:27 PM »
Each choice is perfectly logical, but it depends on your definition of all (or everyone or whatever).


Hmm. Maybe we need some Canadians to come over here and vote so I can see if my hypothesis is right.
« Last Edit: November 22, 2004, 02:38:09 PM by Jon Boy »
You underestimate my ability to take things seriously!

Offline FLR

  • Veteran Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 224
    • View Profile
A linguistic survey
« Reply #8 on: November 22, 2004, 03:14:26 PM »
"Logically" only the second makes sense, because all means each and every.  

The only reading that makes the first possible is if "n't" (not) commands "all" and not "were".  

But the way it is commonly used in speech, "n't" does command "all".
Firenze La Regiphage

Offline Jonathon

  • Evil T-Rex
  • Administrator
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 24,673
  • This is the darkest timeline
    • View Profile
    • GalacticCactus
A linguistic survey
« Reply #9 on: November 22, 2004, 06:05:43 PM »
That's the thing: someone with a different definiton of everybody could use the phrase "everybody doesn't like it" the way we use "not everybody likes it." Such a definition wouldn't be "each and every individual," but rather something like "the group as a whole."
You underestimate my ability to take things seriously!

Offline rivka

  • Linguistic Anarchist
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 14,142
    • View Profile
A linguistic survey
« Reply #10 on: November 22, 2004, 06:14:25 PM »
Grew up in NJ and SoCal (speak patterns are mostly SoCal). I went with the second choice, but I had to think about it. I agree with saxy -- it's poorly phrased, and a bit ambiguous. I like his alternatives better.
"Sometimes you need a weirdo to tell you that things have gotten weird. Your normal friends, neighbors, and coworkers won’t tell you."
-Aaron Kunin

Offline Jonathon

  • Evil T-Rex
  • Administrator
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 24,673
  • This is the darkest timeline
    • View Profile
    • GalacticCactus
A linguistic survey
« Reply #11 on: November 22, 2004, 06:25:25 PM »
Just to clarify: this is just a survey. I'm trying to uncover a possible semantic difference between dialects. I'm not looking for alternatives, though if you want to explain what it is about one or the other that seems funny or illogical, go right ahead.  
You underestimate my ability to take things seriously!

Offline Icarus

  • Scrabblemonger
  • Super Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,772
    • View Profile
A linguistic survey
« Reply #12 on: November 22, 2004, 06:42:36 PM »
I can recognize it as either depending on the context and emphasis. I live in Florida and English is not my first language, so maybe I'm just dumb.  :huh:  

Offline Jonathon

  • Evil T-Rex
  • Administrator
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 24,673
  • This is the darkest timeline
    • View Profile
    • GalacticCactus
A linguistic survey
« Reply #13 on: November 22, 2004, 07:22:27 PM »
Are you the one who voted "other"?



And out of curiosity, how old were you when you learned English?
You underestimate my ability to take things seriously!

Offline Icarus

  • Scrabblemonger
  • Super Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,772
    • View Profile
A linguistic survey
« Reply #14 on: November 22, 2004, 07:37:13 PM »
Yeah, I voted "Other" because "Both" or "Either" weren't options.

I was very young when I learned English. Whatever age kindergarten was.

Offline Nathan Novak

  • Silent Rainbow
  • Super Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,066
    • View Profile
A linguistic survey
« Reply #15 on: November 22, 2004, 08:23:50 PM »
I voted for the second one. I grew up in Utah. Uh... it sounded better.  
Signature.

Offline Lady Montagu

  • Super Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,769
    • View Profile
A linguistic survey
« Reply #16 on: November 23, 2004, 06:10:02 AM »
I voted for "other" for the same reasons saxy outlined. The original sentence could mean either of the first two options.

Texas and Utah.  
Yes, Heaven is thine; but this is a world of sweets and sours;
Our flowers are merely–flowers,
And the shadow of thy perfect bliss is the sunshine of ours.

"Ah... you'll have quite a bit of this. Atmospheric disturbance. Still, it'll pass. Everything does."

Offline Icarus

  • Scrabblemonger
  • Super Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,772
    • View Profile
A linguistic survey
« Reply #17 on: November 23, 2004, 08:13:39 AM »
Saxy or me?

"If you want me bawdy and you think I'm saxy, come on sugar let me know?"  ;)  

Offline FLR

  • Veteran Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 224
    • View Profile
A linguistic survey
« Reply #18 on: November 23, 2004, 11:21:11 AM »
"Piper solo!"
...
"We have a piper down.  I repeat, a piper is down.  Don't worry, he's just pished."
Firenze La Regiphage

Offline Uchiha Itachi

  • Veteran Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 157
    • View Profile
    • http://geocities.com/Chiu_ChunLing/
A linguistic survey
« Reply #19 on: November 23, 2004, 05:25:33 PM »
I'm going to nullify what FLR said.

The meaning is "Not all of them were", unless you remove the contraction to make it read "All of them were not".  "Not all of them were" would equate to "some of them were not" and "All of them were not" would equate to "None of them were".

Using the contraction removes any particular emphasis on the "not" clause and it becomes the less strong "not".  This is generally true for contractions, and if you avoid using a common contraction then it automatically emphasizes the meaning.  "Not" is a particularly good example of this, if you look at it in contraction and out.  The "to be" words are also good examples.

By the way, I nullify FLR because we grew up in the same households (more so than my other sibs, even).

Offline Noemon

  • Arbiter of Cool
  • Super Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,059
    • View Profile
A linguistic survey
« Reply #20 on: November 24, 2004, 07:01:05 AM »
Voted for option 1.  Grew up in northeastern Kansas, of parents who had grown up in different parts of the state (my paternal  grandfather was with the rail road, so my father moved around the state quite a bit growing up, but was mostly from western KS.  My mother was born and raised in northeastern KS
I wish more people were able to be like me. 
-Porter

I'm about perfect.
-pooka

I hope you have a wonderful adventure in Taiwan. Not a swashbuckling adventure, just a prawn flavored pringles adventure.

-pooka

Offline Porter

  • ruining funny with facts
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 22,332
  • long time lurker, first time poster
    • View Profile
A linguistic survey
« Reply #21 on: November 24, 2004, 08:28:54 PM »
I chose the second one.  It's hard to believe that somebody could parse it in any other way.

I have lived 10 years in Texas, 10 years in Oklahoma, and most recently 10 years in Utah.
Tomorrow Poster
Sooner or later, this forum is going to max out on hyperliteralness.

Offline Jonathon

  • Evil T-Rex
  • Administrator
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 24,673
  • This is the darkest timeline
    • View Profile
    • GalacticCactus
A linguistic survey
« Reply #22 on: November 24, 2004, 08:49:17 PM »
So, Noemon, would you be more likely to say "not all of them were" or "all of them weren't"?
You underestimate my ability to take things seriously!

Offline Noemon

  • Arbiter of Cool
  • Super Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,059
    • View Profile
A linguistic survey
« Reply #23 on: November 25, 2004, 10:44:33 PM »
The former, mostly, but I probably produce the latter now and then.  Kind of depends on the context, I suppose.
I wish more people were able to be like me. 
-Porter

I'm about perfect.
-pooka

I hope you have a wonderful adventure in Taiwan. Not a swashbuckling adventure, just a prawn flavored pringles adventure.

-pooka

Offline FLR

  • Veteran Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 224
    • View Profile
A linguistic survey
« Reply #24 on: November 26, 2004, 10:05:29 AM »
Quote
By the way, I nullify FLR because we grew up in the same households (more so than my other sibs, even).
However one of these households was with a dude who thought the thing you put a hot pan on is called a "travis".
Firenze La Regiphage