GalacticCactus Forum

Author Topic: The Perfect Language?  (Read 11183 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Porter

  • ruining funny with facts
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 22,329
  • long time lurker, first time poster
    • View Profile
The Perfect Language?
« Reply #50 on: August 25, 2005, 12:07:34 PM »
Quote
This seems like such an odd strategy. I guess it worked for the French, but it certainly didn't work for the Britons when they invited the Anglo-Saxons to come over.
I wonder if the time period had anything to do with it.  Didn't the Britons try it about 500 years before the French tried it?  Maybe the Vikings got soft as time went on.
Tomorrow Poster
Sooner or later, this forum is going to max out on hyperliteralness.

Offline saxon75

  • Super Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,081
    • View Profile
    • http://www.sakeriver.com
The Perfect Language?
« Reply #51 on: August 25, 2005, 12:07:36 PM »
OK, fine.  Do they still count as conquerors if they were intentionally allowed in? :rolleyes:
Bah weep granah weep ninni bong.

Offline Porter

  • ruining funny with facts
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 22,329
  • long time lurker, first time poster
    • View Profile
The Perfect Language?
« Reply #52 on: August 25, 2005, 12:08:43 PM »
They are conquerors if they conquered.

I name today the day of the tautology.
« Last Edit: August 25, 2005, 12:09:34 PM by mr_porteiro_head »
Tomorrow Poster
Sooner or later, this forum is going to max out on hyperliteralness.

Offline saxon75

  • Super Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,081
    • View Profile
    • http://www.sakeriver.com
The Perfect Language?
« Reply #53 on: August 25, 2005, 12:12:17 PM »
Can a group of alleged conquerors be accurately considered to have conquered if they were intentionally allowed in?
Bah weep granah weep ninni bong.

Offline Porter

  • ruining funny with facts
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 22,329
  • long time lurker, first time poster
    • View Profile
The Perfect Language?
« Reply #54 on: August 25, 2005, 12:13:51 PM »
Of course, if they were first let in, and then they proceeded to conquer.

Who are you talking about?  The Anglo-Saxons?
« Last Edit: August 25, 2005, 12:16:48 PM by mr_porteiro_head »
Tomorrow Poster
Sooner or later, this forum is going to max out on hyperliteralness.

Offline saxon75

  • Super Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,081
    • View Profile
    • http://www.sakeriver.com
The Perfect Language?
« Reply #55 on: August 25, 2005, 12:23:31 PM »
I'm talking about the Vikings who settled in Normandy.
Bah weep granah weep ninni bong.

Offline Jonathon

  • Evil T-Rex
  • Administrator
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 24,649
  • This is the darkest timeline
    • View Profile
    • GalacticCactus
The Perfect Language?
« Reply #56 on: August 25, 2005, 12:25:28 PM »
I wouldn't say they really conquered Normandy.
You underestimate my ability to take things seriously!

Offline Jonathon

  • Evil T-Rex
  • Administrator
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 24,649
  • This is the darkest timeline
    • View Profile
    • GalacticCactus
The Perfect Language?
« Reply #57 on: August 25, 2005, 12:27:39 PM »
Quote
I wonder if the time period had anything to do with it.  Didn't the Britons try it about 500 years before the French tried it?  Maybe the Vikings got soft as time went on.
Yeah, the Anglo-Saxons started invading about the year 500. But they probably went on to conquer because there was no one to stop them, whereas the Norman Vikings probably didn't have the resources or the desire to take over all of France.
You underestimate my ability to take things seriously!

Offline Porter

  • ruining funny with facts
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 22,329
  • long time lurker, first time poster
    • View Profile
The Perfect Language?
« Reply #58 on: August 25, 2005, 12:27:47 PM »
Quote
I wouldn't say they really conquered Normandy.
Neither would I.
« Last Edit: August 25, 2005, 12:28:16 PM by mr_porteiro_head »
Tomorrow Poster
Sooner or later, this forum is going to max out on hyperliteralness.

Offline Icarus

  • Scrabblemonger
  • Super Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,772
    • View Profile
The Perfect Language?
« Reply #59 on: August 25, 2005, 12:29:11 PM »
Wouldn't it suck to be known for all of history as "Charles the Simple"?

Offline Porter

  • ruining funny with facts
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 22,329
  • long time lurker, first time poster
    • View Profile
The Perfect Language?
« Reply #60 on: August 25, 2005, 12:31:01 PM »
At least history knows him.
Tomorrow Poster
Sooner or later, this forum is going to max out on hyperliteralness.

Offline Jonathon

  • Evil T-Rex
  • Administrator
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 24,649
  • This is the darkest timeline
    • View Profile
    • GalacticCactus
The Perfect Language?
« Reply #61 on: August 25, 2005, 12:37:53 PM »
Quote
Wouldn't it suck to be known for all of history as "Charles the Simple"?
Or how about Ethelred the Unready?

You underestimate my ability to take things seriously!

Offline Porter

  • ruining funny with facts
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 22,329
  • long time lurker, first time poster
    • View Profile
The Perfect Language?
« Reply #62 on: August 25, 2005, 12:39:40 PM »
Quote
According to William of Malmesbury, Ethelred defecated in the baptismal font as a child, which led St. Dunstan to prophesy that the English monarchy would be overthrown during Ethelred's reign.
:lol:
« Last Edit: August 25, 2005, 12:39:52 PM by mr_porteiro_head »
Tomorrow Poster
Sooner or later, this forum is going to max out on hyperliteralness.

Offline Jonathon

  • Evil T-Rex
  • Administrator
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 24,649
  • This is the darkest timeline
    • View Profile
    • GalacticCactus
The Perfect Language?
« Reply #63 on: August 25, 2005, 12:49:13 PM »
Quote
This story is, however, almost certainly a fabrication.
That's too bad. And his name wasn't even "unready"! It simply meant "unadvised." History is so much more fun through the rose-colored glasses of ignorance.
You underestimate my ability to take things seriously!

Offline saxon75

  • Super Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,081
    • View Profile
    • http://www.sakeriver.com
The Perfect Language?
« Reply #64 on: August 25, 2005, 12:53:59 PM »
Quote
When they moved to France, did they come as conquerors or just immigrants?
Quote
Conquerors.
Quote
Porter, your links both have to do with the Norman conquest of England, but I was asking about their move from Scandinavia to France, not from France to England.
Quote
From my second link:
Quote
Normandy is a region in northwest France which at the time had experienced extensive Viking settlement. Beginning about 150 years earlier in a French Carolingian ruler Charles the Simple had allowed a group of Vikings, under their leader Rollo, to settle in northern France with the intention they would provide protection along the coast against further Viking invaders. This proved successful and the Vikings, who were known as the Northmen from which Normandy is derived, held off further Viking invaders. The Normans quickly adapted to the indigenous culture, renouncing paganism and converting to Christianity, adopting the langue d'oïl of their new subjects and, through the introduction of Norse features, transforming it into the Norman language, and intermarrying with the local populations.
Quote
Can a group of alleged conquerors be accurately considered to have conquered if they were intentionally allowed in?
Quote
Of course, if they were first let in, and then they proceeded to conquer.

Who are you talking about? The Anglo-Saxons?
Quote
I'm talking about the Vikings who settled in Normandy.
Quote
I wouldn't say they really conquered Normandy.
Quote
Neither would I.
OK, then.  Thanks.
Bah weep granah weep ninni bong.

Offline Jonathon

  • Evil T-Rex
  • Administrator
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 24,649
  • This is the darkest timeline
    • View Profile
    • GalacticCactus
The Perfect Language?
« Reply #65 on: August 25, 2005, 12:58:03 PM »
:lol:

That's a lot of work to go to just to show someone the inconsistency in their argument.
You underestimate my ability to take things seriously!

Offline Porter

  • ruining funny with facts
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 22,329
  • long time lurker, first time poster
    • View Profile
The Perfect Language?
« Reply #66 on: August 25, 2005, 01:04:12 PM »
OH!!!!  I get it now!!!!

I mis-read your question
Quote
When they moved to France, did they come as conquerors or just immigrants?
, substituting England for France.
Tomorrow Poster
Sooner or later, this forum is going to max out on hyperliteralness.

Offline Marianne Dashwood

  • Super Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,767
    • View Profile
The Perfect Language?
« Reply #67 on: August 25, 2005, 01:22:38 PM »
Quote
It must've been that French was a step up from Norse, socially speaking, while English was a step down from French.
This makes the most sense to me so far. French was a better language than Norse, but English was a worse language than French. I get it.
« Last Edit: August 25, 2005, 01:22:58 PM by Marianne Dashwood »
Occam must be shaving in his grave.
-Pooka

Offline Jonathon

  • Evil T-Rex
  • Administrator
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 24,649
  • This is the darkest timeline
    • View Profile
    • GalacticCactus
The Perfect Language?
« Reply #68 on: August 25, 2005, 01:24:37 PM »
More prestigious, not better. :pirate:  
You underestimate my ability to take things seriously!

Offline Porter

  • ruining funny with facts
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 22,329
  • long time lurker, first time poster
    • View Profile
The Perfect Language?
« Reply #69 on: August 25, 2005, 01:30:09 PM »
And that's not why they did it anyway. :pirate:
Tomorrow Poster
Sooner or later, this forum is going to max out on hyperliteralness.

Offline Marianne Dashwood

  • Super Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,767
    • View Profile
The Perfect Language?
« Reply #70 on: August 25, 2005, 01:34:04 PM »
The only question remaining, then, would be whether English was better or worse than Norse. When the Danes moved into Britain, it was pretty much a draw. I don't think we really satisfactorily  answered that question until 1976, when ABBA started recording in English.
Occam must be shaving in his grave.
-Pooka

Offline Noemon

  • Arbiter of Cool
  • Super Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,059
    • View Profile
The Perfect Language?
« Reply #71 on: August 25, 2005, 01:44:27 PM »
Quote
History is so much more fun through the rose-colored glasses of ignorance.

 :lol:  
I wish more people were able to be like me. 
-Porter

I'm about perfect.
-pooka

I hope you have a wonderful adventure in Taiwan. Not a swashbuckling adventure, just a prawn flavored pringles adventure.

-pooka

Offline Jonathon

  • Evil T-Rex
  • Administrator
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 24,649
  • This is the darkest timeline
    • View Profile
    • GalacticCactus
The Perfect Language?
« Reply #72 on: August 25, 2005, 02:07:02 PM »
Quote
The only question remaining, then, would be whether English was better or worse than Norse. When the Danes moved into Britain, it was pretty much a draw. I don't think we really satisfactorily  answered that question until 1976, when ABBA started recording in English.
I think you answered your own question. The Danes spoke a dialect of Old Norse. However, I don't think ABBA helps your case.
You underestimate my ability to take things seriously!

Offline Marianne Dashwood

  • Super Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,767
    • View Profile
The Perfect Language?
« Reply #73 on: August 25, 2005, 02:57:54 PM »
Of course it does. Had ABBA just recorded in Swedish, the Danes would have won.
Occam must be shaving in his grave.
-Pooka

Offline Jonathon

  • Evil T-Rex
  • Administrator
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 24,649
  • This is the darkest timeline
    • View Profile
    • GalacticCactus
The Perfect Language?
« Reply #74 on: August 25, 2005, 03:00:11 PM »
Actually, I guess you're right. The English would've been too busy stabbing icepicks into their ears.
You underestimate my ability to take things seriously!