GalacticCactus Forum

Author Topic: Ponderings on specificity in language  (Read 8715 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline AFR

  • Fully automated
  • Super Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,401
    • View Profile
Ponderings on specificity in language
« Reply #25 on: June 22, 2005, 03:42:03 PM »
Is it syllabification when you say something like "abso-freakin'-lutely"?

(not that I ever say that.)
Hyperliteralness abhors irony.

"No, actually I totally agree with AFR." --Annie Subjunctive

Offline Jonathon

  • Evil T-Rex
  • Administrator
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 24,788
  • This is the darkest timeline
    • View Profile
    • GalacticCactus
Ponderings on specificity in language
« Reply #26 on: June 22, 2005, 03:48:22 PM »
Syllabification is the process of breaking something up into syllables. Inserting a word into another like that is a sort of infixation process, though it does rely on syllable and stress boundaries.
You underestimate my ability to take things seriously!

Offline rivka

  • Linguistic Anarchist
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 14,351
    • View Profile
Ponderings on specificity in language
« Reply #27 on: June 22, 2005, 03:56:40 PM »
Quote
I think it has more to do with x-rays and mammograms and stuff.

Edit: I was wrong. M-W says: "a radioactive drug used for diagnostic or therapeutic purposes."

So MRIs? CT scans? Radiation therapy?
Radioisotope-containing drugs are used for (among other things): diagnosing and treating thyroid problems; diagnosing and treating certain cancers; diagnosing certain digestive disorders (the infamous "barium enema"); making people glow in the dark and set off Geiger counters.

Detection methods include PET scans, x-rays, and gamma ray detectors (aka gamma cameras).

More here, here, and here.
"Expecting loved ones to read our minds is the greased slide to misery. No matter how obvious we all think it all “should” be."
-Carolyn Hax