GalacticCactus Forum

Author Topic: Dear Expert  (Read 165791 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Jonathon

  • Evil T-Rex
  • Administrator
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 24,680
  • This is the darkest timeline
    • View Profile
    • GalacticCactus
Re: Dear Expert
« Reply #250 on: August 14, 2011, 05:12:58 PM »
I do. I'm just skeptical of your evidence—it only takes one person to write a Wikipedia article, neh? And yet the OED has never seen it used enough to warrant its entry, whereas it does have diaeresis:

Quote
The sign [¨] marking such a division [of one syllable into two], or, more usually, placed over the second of two vowels which otherwise make a diphthong or single sound, to indicate that they are to be pronounced separately.
You underestimate my ability to take things seriously!

Offline The Genuine

  • Ambcloacador of Right On
  • Super Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,570
    • View Profile
Re: Dear Expert
« Reply #251 on: August 14, 2011, 05:17:18 PM »
Pfft.

It only takes one person to write an OED.
I think Jesse's right.

 -- Jonathon

Offline Jonathon

  • Evil T-Rex
  • Administrator
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 24,680
  • This is the darkest timeline
    • View Profile
    • GalacticCactus
Re: Dear Expert
« Reply #252 on: August 14, 2011, 05:24:38 PM »
Even if that were true, how many did it take to write all the quotations they use as evidence?
You underestimate my ability to take things seriously!

Offline Marianne Dashwood

  • Super Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,767
    • View Profile
Re: Dear Expert
« Reply #253 on: August 14, 2011, 05:32:27 PM »
I think the purpose of calling it a trema instead of a diaeresis is that it means the diacritical mark when it's used for diaeresis (as it always is in English) as well as when it's used for umlaut (which, coincidentally, most people would call the mark even though we don't use it for umlaut in English). If we called it a diaeresis, we wouldn't be talking about the mark used for umlaut as well.

And it wasn't just one person. It was a group of people who, incidentally, already had this conversation.
Occam must be shaving in his grave.
-Pooka

Offline Jonathon

  • Evil T-Rex
  • Administrator
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 24,680
  • This is the darkest timeline
    • View Profile
    • GalacticCactus
Re: Dear Expert
« Reply #254 on: August 14, 2011, 05:58:20 PM »
Hey, you're the one who impugned my claim to be a descriptivist while putting forward iffy evidence yourself. The talk page shows that there's a dispute among some people, not that trema is the more widely accepted term.

Quote
If we called it a diaeresis, we wouldn't be talking about the mark used for umlaut as well.
Which was pretty much my point. There are no umlauts in English aside from the heavy-metal kind.
You underestimate my ability to take things seriously!

Offline Jonathon

  • Evil T-Rex
  • Administrator
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 24,680
  • This is the darkest timeline
    • View Profile
    • GalacticCactus
Re: Dear Expert
« Reply #255 on: August 14, 2011, 06:36:25 PM »
For the record, I just assumed* that you didn't know the English term for the mark and were using the French term, because I've done that myself. I was trying to be helpful, and I'm sorry if it came across as pedantic.


*You know what happens when you assume.
You underestimate my ability to take things seriously!

Offline The Genuine

  • Ambcloacador of Right On
  • Super Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,570
    • View Profile
Re: Dear Expert
« Reply #256 on: August 14, 2011, 07:12:08 PM »
Even if that were true, how many did it take to write all the quotations they use as evidence?


I don't know, but that's a mind-blowing body of work.

(Probably 50% Shakespeare, right?)
I think Jesse's right.

 -- Jonathon

Offline Jonathon

  • Evil T-Rex
  • Administrator
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 24,680
  • This is the darkest timeline
    • View Profile
    • GalacticCactus
Re: Dear Expert
« Reply #257 on: August 14, 2011, 07:16:06 PM »
Probably not. The quotes span nearly 1500 years of English, but Shakespeare's works span only about a quarter of a century.
You underestimate my ability to take things seriously!

Offline The Genuine

  • Ambcloacador of Right On
  • Super Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,570
    • View Profile
Re: Dear Expert
« Reply #258 on: August 14, 2011, 07:27:20 PM »
Yeah I was kidding (which I think you were on to).  But it would be cool to read all that stuff, huh?


While I'm here, should I have written onto?
I think Jesse's right.

 -- Jonathon

Offline Jonathon

  • Evil T-Rex
  • Administrator
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 24,680
  • This is the darkest timeline
    • View Profile
    • GalacticCactus
Re: Dear Expert
« Reply #259 on: August 14, 2011, 07:37:40 PM »
While I'm here, should I have written onto?

I'd say no, but I'm honestly not sure. This is one of those vexing little things that I've never sorted out, like can not/cannot. But this site says that they're often interchangeable, so maybe it just doesn't matter.
You underestimate my ability to take things seriously!

Offline Marianne Dashwood

  • Super Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,767
    • View Profile
Re: Dear Expert
« Reply #260 on: August 14, 2011, 09:54:40 PM »
For the record, I just assumed* that you didn't know the English term for the mark and were using the French term, because I've done that myself. I was trying to be helpful, and I'm sorry if it came across as pedantic.


*You know what happens when you assume.

Gotcha. I assumed you were being helpful, but was trying to justify my choice of word. It led, in the end, to being much more aware of the subject than I was before.
Occam must be shaving in his grave.
-Pooka

Offline Scott R

  • Mr. Astounding
  • Super Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,341
    • View Profile
Re: Dear Expert
« Reply #261 on: August 19, 2011, 12:13:58 PM »
This is driving me crazy.

CANNOT.

NOT "CAN NOT."

Am I right?  Huh?

Offline Porter

  • ruining funny with facts
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 22,333
  • long time lurker, first time poster
    • View Profile
Re: Dear Expert
« Reply #262 on: August 19, 2011, 12:27:40 PM »
From dictionary.com:

Quote
cannot is sometimes also spelled can not. The one-word spelling is by far the more common
Tomorrow Poster
Sooner or later, this forum is going to max out on hyperliteralness.

Offline Jonathon

  • Evil T-Rex
  • Administrator
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 24,680
  • This is the darkest timeline
    • View Profile
    • GalacticCactus
Re: Dear Expert
« Reply #263 on: August 19, 2011, 01:42:51 PM »
Everything I can find says they're interchangeable, though most people giving advice will still give you the weaselly "But you should use cannot anyway."
You underestimate my ability to take things seriously!

Offline Porter

  • ruining funny with facts
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 22,333
  • long time lurker, first time poster
    • View Profile
Re: Dear Expert
« Reply #264 on: August 20, 2011, 10:28:00 PM »
I had to do a search to figure out which one I use.
Tomorrow Poster
Sooner or later, this forum is going to max out on hyperliteralness.

Offline Marianne Dashwood

  • Super Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,767
    • View Profile
Re: Dear Expert
« Reply #265 on: August 21, 2011, 03:50:13 PM »
I personally prefer cain't.
Occam must be shaving in his grave.
-Pooka

Offline BlackBlade

  • Deadbeat Dad
  • Super Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,029
  • Gifs are all lies.
    • View Profile
Re: Dear Expert
« Reply #266 on: August 21, 2011, 04:32:09 PM »
I personally prefer cain't.
I'm partial to avoiding the whole debate in favor of [/i]not no-how[/i].
Kyrgyzstan, is the homeland of the Kyrgyzs, a people best known for cheating at Scrabble. -Tante Shvester

What, you expected us to be badly injured or dead, and flying blind to boot? You're the one who told us all to be Awesome. -Brinestone

Offline pooka

  • hover bear
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,877
    • View Profile
Re: Dear Expert
« Reply #267 on: August 22, 2011, 07:33:48 AM »
I'm not sure when I'd use cannot instead of can't. 
"From each according to his ability, to each according to his work."  Comte de Saint-Simon

Offline dkw

  • Super Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,016
    • View Profile
Re: Dear Expert
« Reply #268 on: September 07, 2011, 09:46:01 AM »
Bibliography question -- The guy I'm editing for has consistently put a comma rather than a period after the name of the author when the author only has one name (like Aristotle).  I wasn't aware that there was a difference, but none of the examples in my handy shortcut guide are one-namers and I don't want to hike over to the library to check Chicago.  Jonathon, I'm assuming you know this one off the top of your head -- should it be a period like all the other entries?

Offline Jonathon

  • Evil T-Rex
  • Administrator
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 24,680
  • This is the darkest timeline
    • View Profile
    • GalacticCactus
Re: Dear Expert
« Reply #269 on: September 07, 2011, 11:32:09 AM »
I didn't know off the top of my head, but I looked it up pretty quickly. (Hooray for online access!) This is what Chicago 16 says:

Quote
Authors known only by their given names (i.e., and not by any surname) are listed and alphabetized by those names. Such titles as “King” or “Saint” are omitted.

Augustine. On Christian Doctrine. Translated by D. W. Robertson Jr. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1958.
Elizabeth I. Collected Works. Edited by Leah S. Marcus, Janel Mueller, and Mary Beth Rose. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000.

It should be a period like all the other entries.
You underestimate my ability to take things seriously!

Offline dkw

  • Super Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,016
    • View Profile
Re: Dear Expert
« Reply #270 on: September 07, 2011, 04:38:45 PM »
Thank you.  I thought that was probably true (or at least I couldn't think of any reason why it wouldn't be) but I didn't want to change it in someone else's work unless I was sure.

Offline Jonathon

  • Evil T-Rex
  • Administrator
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 24,680
  • This is the darkest timeline
    • View Profile
    • GalacticCactus
Re: Dear Expert
« Reply #271 on: September 07, 2011, 06:29:27 PM »
No problem.
You underestimate my ability to take things seriously!

Offline BlackBlade

  • Deadbeat Dad
  • Super Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,029
  • Gifs are all lies.
    • View Profile
Re: Dear Expert
« Reply #272 on: September 12, 2011, 03:04:54 PM »
"I'll give it a looksee". Dictionary.com at least recognizes the word, and while it makes sense to combine those two verbs as a sort of informal lookover, is it possible the word was supposed to be "Looksy/looksie/looksey" where we attach the sound "ee" like in the word "looky looky" so as to give a word a more informal playful taste? Much like the words "meanie" "dummy" "hottie".

Kyrgyzstan, is the homeland of the Kyrgyzs, a people best known for cheating at Scrabble. -Tante Shvester

What, you expected us to be badly injured or dead, and flying blind to boot? You're the one who told us all to be Awesome. -Brinestone

Offline Jonathon

  • Evil T-Rex
  • Administrator
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 24,680
  • This is the darkest timeline
    • View Profile
    • GalacticCactus
Re: Dear Expert
« Reply #273 on: September 12, 2011, 03:11:52 PM »
The OED says of the etymology of look-see, "Pidgin-like formation < look n. or look v. + see v." Not terribly helpful. And Etymonline is even less helpful. All I can find about it so far is that it's either from a form of Pidgin English or is simply imitative of Pidgin English.
You underestimate my ability to take things seriously!

Offline BlackBlade

  • Deadbeat Dad
  • Super Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,029
  • Gifs are all lies.
    • View Profile
Re: Dear Expert
« Reply #274 on: September 12, 2011, 03:37:51 PM »
I guess we'll never know.
Kyrgyzstan, is the homeland of the Kyrgyzs, a people best known for cheating at Scrabble. -Tante Shvester

What, you expected us to be badly injured or dead, and flying blind to boot? You're the one who told us all to be Awesome. -Brinestone