GalacticCactus Forum

Author Topic: a suffix question  (Read 6109 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline sweet clementine

  • nigh unto importance
  • Super Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,903
    • View Profile
a suffix question
« on: September 24, 2009, 12:13:12 AM »
so, I was making up a word for my Humanities of Asia paper and I asked my roommate if she liked "philisophicality" better than "philisophicalness" and she said she hates words that end in "ness" and thinks they should all be replaced with "ality".  I was just wondering what the difference is between them, or if there is a difference, and how did they each develop?
"I must be due for a mighty smiting sometime soon." ~Annie

Offline Tante Shvester

  • Souper Member
  • Super Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 9,866
    • View Profile
    • About Tante
a suffix question
« Reply #1 on: September 24, 2009, 02:16:07 AM »
When she gets weary, try a little tenderality.
Fighting thread drift with guilt, reverse psychology, and chicken soup.
Sweet! Law of Moses loopholes! -- Anneke
I love Bones.  -- Sweet Clementine
She grew on him like she was a colony of E. coli and he was room-temperature Canadian beef. -- anonymous

Offline Annie Subjunctive

  • Hausfrau
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,921
    • View Profile
a suffix question
« Reply #2 on: September 24, 2009, 06:00:02 AM »
It seems to me that there would be a nuanced difference. As in, philosophicality would be someone's inclination to be philosophical, whereas philosophicalness would be an attribute with which they acted. "His cooking was dripping with philosophicalness."
"It is true, however, that the opposite of Little Rock, Arkansas is Boulder, Colorado." - Tante

Offline The Genuine

  • Ambcloacador of Right On
  • Super Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,570
    • View Profile
a suffix question
« Reply #3 on: September 24, 2009, 08:07:25 AM »
I wouldn't use either word in a paper.
I think Jesse's right.

 -- Jonathon

Offline Jonathon

  • Evil T-Rex
  • Administrator
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 24,673
  • This is the darkest timeline
    • View Profile
    • GalacticCactus
a suffix question
« Reply #4 on: September 24, 2009, 09:59:21 AM »
The suffix -ality is actually two suffixes, -al + -ity, which derive from Latin. -al attaches to Latinate words to form adjectives or occasionally nouns, and -ity can then attach to form nouns.

-ness comes instead from Old English and is a little less restricted in its application. Your roommate's preference is rather irrational, because -ity or -ality simply don't work on a lot of words. I mean, happyity? Really?

I think the biggest difference is one of register—the Latin suffixes can sometimes sound a little bit more formal or elevated than the English equivalents.
You underestimate my ability to take things seriously!

Offline Porter

  • ruining funny with facts
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 22,332
  • long time lurker, first time poster
    • View Profile
a suffix question
« Reply #5 on: September 24, 2009, 11:10:47 AM »
Quote
I was making up a word for my Humanities of Asia paper
There's your problem.
Tomorrow Poster
Sooner or later, this forum is going to max out on hyperliteralness.

Offline saxon75

  • Super Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,081
    • View Profile
    • http://www.sakeriver.com
a suffix question
« Reply #6 on: September 24, 2009, 11:13:23 AM »
I propose that we all henceforth use "happyality."  Or, if you prefer, "happiality."
Bah weep granah weep ninni bong.

Offline Tante Shvester

  • Souper Member
  • Super Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 9,866
    • View Profile
    • About Tante
a suffix question
« Reply #7 on: September 24, 2009, 11:43:26 AM »
I favor The Untouchables, with Ellioticality.
Fighting thread drift with guilt, reverse psychology, and chicken soup.
Sweet! Law of Moses loopholes! -- Anneke
I love Bones.  -- Sweet Clementine
She grew on him like she was a colony of E. coli and he was room-temperature Canadian beef. -- anonymous

Offline sweet clementine

  • nigh unto importance
  • Super Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,903
    • View Profile
a suffix question
« Reply #8 on: September 24, 2009, 02:33:02 PM »
Quote
Quote
I was making up a word for my Humanities of Asia paper
There's your problem.
It certainly was not my problem.  It fit perfectly and conveyed my meaning.  Where would we be if Shakespeare or Chaucer's English teachers had told them to stop making up new words?
"I must be due for a mighty smiting sometime soon." ~Annie

Offline goofy

  • Veteran Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 154
    • View Profile
    • http://
a suffix question
« Reply #9 on: September 24, 2009, 06:45:27 PM »
Quote
It certainly was not my problem.  It fit perfectly and conveyed my meaning.  Where would we be if Shakespeare or Chaucer's English teachers had told them to stop making up new words?
Shakespeare and Chaucer didn't have English teachers. So it is your problem. :)

I find it interesting that we have both reality and realness.
« Last Edit: September 24, 2009, 06:45:42 PM by goofy »

Offline pooka

  • hover bear
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,872
    • View Profile
a suffix question
« Reply #10 on: September 24, 2009, 06:55:13 PM »
I don't know that I've heard realness before.

I used to whinge about wellness.
"From each according to his ability, to each according to his work."  Comte de Saint-Simon

Offline Jonathon

  • Evil T-Rex
  • Administrator
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 24,673
  • This is the darkest timeline
    • View Profile
    • GalacticCactus
a suffix question
« Reply #11 on: September 24, 2009, 07:33:57 PM »
Don't forget normality, normalness, and normalcy.
You underestimate my ability to take things seriously!

Offline Porter

  • ruining funny with facts
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 22,332
  • long time lurker, first time poster
    • View Profile
a suffix question
« Reply #12 on: September 24, 2009, 08:23:13 PM »
Quote
Quote
Quote
I was making up a word for my Humanities of Asia paper
There's your problem.
It certainly was not my problem.  It fit perfectly and conveyed my meaning.  Where would we be if Shakespeare or Chaucer's English teachers had told them to stop making up new words?
I've got no problems with making up new words, or using existing words in new ways.  Verbing can awesome language, as it were.  But it's still not a good idea to use made up words in formal writing, such as academic papers.  
Tomorrow Poster
Sooner or later, this forum is going to max out on hyperliteralness.

Offline sweet clementine

  • nigh unto importance
  • Super Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,903
    • View Profile
a suffix question
« Reply #13 on: September 24, 2009, 11:48:03 PM »
I know.  I'll let you know if I get marked down for it.  This was the context:
"It is, however, at the moments when his writing is becoming the most philosophical that Winnie the Pooh has a tendency to interrupt and bring things quickly back to simplicity and accessibility.  And despite this avoidance of overt philisophicality, Hoff still successfully communicates his thoughts—indeed, because of it."
And I don't want to hear anything about beginning a sentence with "and".  When used sparingly it is rhetorically effective.
"I must be due for a mighty smiting sometime soon." ~Annie

Offline Annie Subjunctive

  • Hausfrau
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,921
    • View Profile
a suffix question
« Reply #14 on: September 25, 2009, 12:05:42 AM »
I think it's fine. It's not like a paper you're submitting to be published in a journal.

One time I wrote an art history entirely spelled and punctuated the British way just to see what my professor would do. He marked every single one wrong.
"It is true, however, that the opposite of Little Rock, Arkansas is Boulder, Colorado." - Tante

Offline pooka

  • hover bear
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,872
    • View Profile
a suffix question
« Reply #15 on: September 25, 2009, 06:07:19 AM »
I'd say philosophicalness implies a property of a being who is philosophical, whereas philosophicality implies the quality of that being being philosophical.  So I would say that is the way to go in this instance.
"From each according to his ability, to each according to his work."  Comte de Saint-Simon

Offline Brinestone

  • Nerdkins
  • Super Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,232
    • View Profile
a suffix question
« Reply #16 on: September 25, 2009, 08:13:37 AM »
I think it sounds excellent.
Ephemerality is not binary. -Porter

Offline sweet clementine

  • nigh unto importance
  • Super Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,903
    • View Profile
a suffix question
« Reply #17 on: September 25, 2009, 08:46:42 AM »
oh, bless your hearts....
"I must be due for a mighty smiting sometime soon." ~Annie

Offline Porter

  • ruining funny with facts
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 22,332
  • long time lurker, first time poster
    • View Profile
a suffix question
« Reply #18 on: September 25, 2009, 09:34:35 AM »
Quote
And I don't want to hear anything about beginning a sentence with "and".
But you can't start a sentence with a conjunction! ;)

(Seriously -- I've got no problems with starting sentences with conjunction or ending them with prepositions.)
Tomorrow Poster
Sooner or later, this forum is going to max out on hyperliteralness.

Offline dkw

  • Super Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,016
    • View Profile
a suffix question
« Reply #19 on: September 30, 2009, 06:19:26 PM »
Quote
I've got no problems with making up new words, or using existing words in new ways.  Verbing can awesome language, as it were.  But it's still not a good idea to use made up words in formal writing, such as academic papers.
Part of the pain-in-the-assedness of reading academic German is that this rule is reversed.  It is apparently considered the height of academic coolness to adjectivify words (or even entire phrases), make up new compound words, and otherwise play language games in German formal writing.  

Offline Porter

  • ruining funny with facts
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 22,332
  • long time lurker, first time poster
    • View Profile
a suffix question
« Reply #20 on: September 30, 2009, 08:47:14 PM »
That would be a pain in the buttedness.
Tomorrow Poster
Sooner or later, this forum is going to max out on hyperliteralness.

Offline Tante Shvester

  • Souper Member
  • Super Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 9,866
    • View Profile
    • About Tante
a suffix question
« Reply #21 on: September 30, 2009, 09:05:36 PM »
Gesäßschmerzkeit.
Fighting thread drift with guilt, reverse psychology, and chicken soup.
Sweet! Law of Moses loopholes! -- Anneke
I love Bones.  -- Sweet Clementine
She grew on him like she was a colony of E. coli and he was room-temperature Canadian beef. -- anonymous

Offline Jonathon

  • Evil T-Rex
  • Administrator
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 24,673
  • This is the darkest timeline
    • View Profile
    • GalacticCactus
a suffix question
« Reply #22 on: September 30, 2009, 09:39:20 PM »
:lol:


[size=8]Even though äß is not a real German word as far as I can tell.[/size]
You underestimate my ability to take things seriously!

Offline Tante Shvester

  • Souper Member
  • Super Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 9,866
    • View Profile
    • About Tante
a suffix question
« Reply #23 on: September 30, 2009, 10:18:58 PM »
"Gesäß" is "buttocks".  That part I had to look up.  The rest I made up, German-style.
Fighting thread drift with guilt, reverse psychology, and chicken soup.
Sweet! Law of Moses loopholes! -- Anneke
I love Bones.  -- Sweet Clementine
She grew on him like she was a colony of E. coli and he was room-temperature Canadian beef. -- anonymous

Offline Jonathon

  • Evil T-Rex
  • Administrator
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 24,673
  • This is the darkest timeline
    • View Profile
    • GalacticCactus
a suffix question
« Reply #24 on: September 30, 2009, 10:43:14 PM »
Well, then, I take it back. The closest I could find was Arsch, which is German for "arse".
You underestimate my ability to take things seriously!