GalacticCactus Forum

Author Topic: Technical Term vs. Common Usage  (Read 4325 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline pooka

  • hover bear
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,852
    • View Profile
Technical Term vs. Common Usage
« Reply #25 on: December 18, 2007, 05:27:29 AM »
Quote
What did you think a newton was for?
Wrapping around fig paste?
« Last Edit: December 19, 2007, 01:01:34 PM by pooka »
"From each according to his ability, to each according to his work."  Comte de Saint-Simon

Offline Porter

  • ruining funny with facts
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 22,329
  • long time lurker, first time poster
    • View Profile
Technical Term vs. Common Usage
« Reply #26 on: December 18, 2007, 08:00:11 AM »
A newton is the SI unit for force or weight.

The old English unit for mass is the slug, but it's become increasingly common for people to use the "pounds mass" unit, which is the amount of mass that would weigh one pound of force under exactly 1.0 gravities (32.2 feet per second squared, IIRC).
Tomorrow Poster
Sooner or later, this forum is going to max out on hyperliteralness.

Offline Noemon

  • Arbiter of Cool
  • Super Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,059
    • View Profile
Technical Term vs. Common Usage
« Reply #27 on: December 18, 2007, 10:42:08 AM »
Quote
Wrapping around fig paste?
Great TOPP.
I wish more people were able to be like me. 
-Porter

I'm about perfect.
-pooka

I hope you have a wonderful adventure in Taiwan. Not a swashbuckling adventure, just a prawn flavored pringles adventure.

-pooka

Offline Sheila

  • Super Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,525
    • View Profile
Technical Term vs. Common Usage
« Reply #28 on: December 18, 2007, 01:02:28 PM »
Mass is the concentration of combat power.  :rolleyes:  
Don't dilly-dally. Threaten to take off your pants.
-Porter