0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I want you to make something that would automatically correct the passive-aggressive voice.I'd do it myself, except I don't want to.
And I'm not terribly invested in this. While I do think we should keep the fewer/less distinction, if it becomes accepted not to (as "hopefully" officially now means what it did not used to), I will grit my teeth and bear it.Meanwhile, I will cheerfully gripe about "10 items or less" signs.
Someone who somehow came across my Arrant Pedantry blog several months ago and who has a blog of his own dedicated mostly to cool and obscure etymologies.Welcome!
So, did y'all get the science/shit connection from the same source, or were you his source?
But I think the final straw was annoyance with a lot of my fellow editors. Almost none of them seemed interested in doing anything other than following the strictures laid out in style guides and usage manuals (Merriam-Webster’s Dictionary of English Usage was somehow exempt from reference). And far too often, the changes they made did nothing to improve the clarity, readability, or accuracy of the text. Without any depth of knowledge about the issues, they were left without the ability to make informed judgements about what should be changed.