I read
this blog post on CNN Money earlier today and had roughly the same reaction as the author. I'm only familiar with "actionable" as a legal term meaning "subject to legal action," not as business jargon meaning "capable of being acted on." And even if both meanings exist, I think CNBC's usage is ambiguous at best and stupid at worst.
But it made me wonder, how many people think of the legal definition first, and how many think of the business definition?