GalacticCactus Forum

Author Topic: Thirty Hundred  (Read 2226 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Porter

  • ruining funny with facts
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 22,329
  • long time lurker, first time poster
    • View Profile
Thirty Hundred
« on: September 21, 2005, 09:09:29 AM »
Twenty-Nine hundred = Two thousand, nine hundred.  Fine.
Thirty-One hundred = Three thousand, one hundred.  Fine.

But...

Thirty hundred doesn't sound right.

Why?
Tomorrow Poster
Sooner or later, this forum is going to max out on hyperliteralness.

Offline Brinestone

  • Nerdkins
  • Super Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,232
    • View Profile
Thirty Hundred
« Reply #1 on: September 21, 2005, 09:24:03 AM »
Because "three thousand" is easy to say, so we say it more often.  
Ephemerality is not binary. -Porter

Offline Jonathon

  • Evil T-Rex
  • Administrator
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 24,649
  • This is the darkest timeline
    • View Profile
    • GalacticCactus
Thirty Hundred
« Reply #2 on: September 21, 2005, 09:32:10 AM »
The "twenty-nine hundred" method is used when it's shorter. "Thirty hundred" isn't shorter than the more straightforward "three thousand," so there's no reason to say it.
You underestimate my ability to take things seriously!

Offline Porter

  • ruining funny with facts
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 22,329
  • long time lurker, first time poster
    • View Profile
Thirty Hundred
« Reply #3 on: September 21, 2005, 09:32:53 AM »
Huh.  That makes a lot of sense.

Why didn't I think of that?
Tomorrow Poster
Sooner or later, this forum is going to max out on hyperliteralness.

Offline Jonathon

  • Evil T-Rex
  • Administrator
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 24,649
  • This is the darkest timeline
    • View Profile
    • GalacticCactus
Thirty Hundred
« Reply #4 on: September 21, 2005, 09:33:23 AM »
Because you're an engineer. :P  
You underestimate my ability to take things seriously!

Offline Porter

  • ruining funny with facts
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 22,329
  • long time lurker, first time poster
    • View Profile
Thirty Hundred
« Reply #5 on: September 21, 2005, 09:34:54 AM »
No, that's not it.
Tomorrow Poster
Sooner or later, this forum is going to max out on hyperliteralness.

Offline pattyshmack

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 86
    • View Profile
    • http://
Thirty Hundred
« Reply #6 on: September 21, 2005, 12:21:48 PM »
The other day I was trying to figure out how to say 2053 differently.  I ended up saying twenty-hundred and fifty-three and it sounded really stupid.  I like the usual two-thousand and fifty-three.  (By the way I was trying to say the year 2053)
The worst part of having a swirly is having your hair be soaked in putrid, rancid, pee tainted water.

Offline rivka

  • Linguistic Anarchist
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 14,099
    • View Profile
Thirty Hundred
« Reply #7 on: September 21, 2005, 08:20:45 PM »
Why? Does your cellphone's calendar only go up to that date?
"Sometimes you need a weirdo to tell you that things have gotten weird. Your normal friends, neighbors, and coworkers won’t tell you."
-Aaron Kunin

Offline pooka

  • hover bear
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,852
    • View Profile
Thirty Hundred
« Reply #8 on: September 26, 2005, 01:06:10 PM »
But thirty-five hundred works.

Is twenty hundred really okay without some other number between the twenty and the hundred?  Do people really say ten hundred?  I think people know what you mean if you say them.  But once you have asked the question, you can no longer provide data.  Unless you can go back to some video or recording made previously.

I once accidentally recorded my siblings and I hanging around talking one sunday afternoon.  I moved some stuff off the piano and the tape recorder fell on the floor in a way that it magically started recording.

One of the challenges of linguistic study is that it is generally considered ethical to let people know they are being studied, but if they know they are being studied they don't talk naturally.  
"From each according to his ability, to each according to his work."  Comte de Saint-Simon

Offline Teshi

  • Veteran Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 517
    • View Profile
Thirty Hundred
« Reply #9 on: October 08, 2005, 10:08:20 AM »
I might say 2053 as just "twenty fifty-three". After all, you don't say "ninteen hundred ninety-nine" you say "nineteen ninety-nine".

Offline Porter

  • ruining funny with facts
  • Übermember
  • *****
  • Posts: 22,329
  • long time lurker, first time poster
    • View Profile
Thirty Hundred
« Reply #10 on: October 08, 2005, 10:52:01 AM »
Actually, I do say "ninteen hundred and ninety-nine" except for when I am referring to date.
Tomorrow Poster
Sooner or later, this forum is going to max out on hyperliteralness.

Offline Teshi

  • Veteran Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 517
    • View Profile
Thirty Hundred
« Reply #11 on: October 08, 2005, 10:56:28 AM »
I am talking about years because pattyshmack was talking about years. Normal numbers I would say one thousand nine hundred and ninety nine.