1
English & Linguistics / AAVE, aka Ebonics and school teachers
« on: October 08, 2006, 04:38:31 PM »
The professor that teaches linguistic anthropology asked me to stay after class Friday. turns out that one of areas of interest is African American Vernacular English, also called "Ebonics" and he wanted to know what I thought about the debate between whether AAVE is a separate language or just a dialect of English. He was interested in my opinion not because of my beauty and brilliance, (though those should have been factors) but because he knew I was working toward becoming an English teacher.
He said, and I quote: "It's criminal that we don't train teachers in the grammar and structure of AAVE. If you're teaching black kids, you should know the basics of AAVE."
What do you guys think? First, do you think it should be treated as a second language or as another dialect of English? And, do you think that we should train teachers in AAVE so they can better relate to and teach black students?
I'm not trying to start a topic without giving my opinion, honestly I'm still formulating one. I don't know much about AAVE, beyond what the media brouhaha over Ebonics in the Oakland school system reported, and from my reading of more scholarly sources, the media didn't get things quite right. So I'm reading and studying and thought I might get the thoughts of some of you guys who've much more experience in linguistic study than me.
He said, and I quote: "It's criminal that we don't train teachers in the grammar and structure of AAVE. If you're teaching black kids, you should know the basics of AAVE."
What do you guys think? First, do you think it should be treated as a second language or as another dialect of English? And, do you think that we should train teachers in AAVE so they can better relate to and teach black students?
I'm not trying to start a topic without giving my opinion, honestly I'm still formulating one. I don't know much about AAVE, beyond what the media brouhaha over Ebonics in the Oakland school system reported, and from my reading of more scholarly sources, the media didn't get things quite right. So I'm reading and studying and thought I might get the thoughts of some of you guys who've much more experience in linguistic study than me.